Month 1999-12 December
Meeting of 1999-12-9 Emergency Meeting
MINUTES
LAWTON CITY COUNCIL EMERGENCY MEETING
DECEMBER 9, 1999 - 8:30 A.M.
WAYNE GILLEY CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER
Mayor Cecil E. Powell, Also Present:
Presiding Bill Baker, City Manager
John Vincent, City Attorney
Brenda Smith, City Clerk
The meeting was called to order at 8:30 a.m. by Mayor Powell. Notice of meeting and agenda
were posted on the City Hall notice board as required by State Law.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: G. Wayne Smith, Ward One
Richard Williams, Ward Two
Glenn Devine, Ward Three
John Purcell, Ward Four
Robert Shanklin, Ward Five
Charles Beller, Ward Six
Stanley Haywood, Ward Seven
Randy Warren, Ward Eight
ABSENT: None.
STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DECLARING EMERGENCY MEETING (stated below)
BUSINESS ITEMS:
1. Consider approving a resolution amending Resolutions 99-138 and 99-146, by
changing the
date of the special election on the adoption of an employment agreement by and between the City
of Lawton and the International Association of Firefighters, Local 1882, for the fiscal year 1999-2000.
Exhibits: Resolution No. 99-147.
Baker thanked the Mayor and Council for attending on such short notice. He said yesterday
afternoon he asked the Mayor to call an emergency meeting, which he agreed to do, and that was
prompted by a telephone call from the local election board advising of a problem. Baker said
resolutions and an ordinance had been passed that set an election for January 11 for two
propositions; the first proposition was to consider the City or the Firefighter Union contract and
the second proposition was a sales tax to support the contract if the firefighters contract was
chosen by the public. He said the local election board advised him yesterday afternoon that the
second proposition required a 60-day advance notice; on the first proposition, it is clear in the
State Statutes that only 30 days is required, and we had been operating under the opinion that
since both of these were directly related that both of them would fall under that statute as being
union related and that each would only require the 30-day notice.
Baker said after receiving the information from the local election board, he consulted with the
City Attorney and the City Clerk, and Vincent called the State Election Board and tried to
convince them that 30 days was appropriate and they would not come off of that and confirmed
what the local election board had stated.
Baker said he would like to state the nature of the emergency. He said it is required when an
emergency meeting is called to state the nature of the emergency, and read as follows: "in the
written minutes of an emergency meeting, the nature of the emergency and the proceedings
occurring at such meeting, including reasons for declaring such emergency meeting, shall be
included." Baker said the reason he asked the Mayor to call this emergency meeting was first, the
statute allows for emergency meetings if the municipal corporation has or there could be an
immediate, significant financial obligation or hardship imposed if the action is not taken. He said
the second reason for the emergency meeting was in order to have an election on February 8th,
today is the last date that we can pass the resolution. Baker said the statute also says that in
matters of contract that once an arbitrator has rendered the decision and the Council calls for an
election, that the election should be in a reasonable amount of time, and he did not know how
you define a reasonable amount of time, but if you wait too many months, it would not be
reasonable, and February would still be reasonable and we must comply with the 60 days. He
said it is important to have both propositions voted on at the same date, so we are asking the
Council in the first item, to pass a resolution to amend Resolutions 99-138, which was approved
November 16 which called for a special election, and Resolution 99-146 that set the ballot
propositions. Baker said we are asking that Council pass the resolution to amend both of those
resolutions to change the date of the election from January 11 to February 8, 2000.
MOVED by Purcell, SECOND by Devine, to approve Resolution No. 99-147.
Beller said when we talk about the emergency portions of this, his concern was if there would be
a problem as to whether this was, in fact, an emergency. He asked why it had to be an emergency
meeting and why it could not have been called in the proper order with notices being posted and
do this on Monday or Tuesday. Beller said his concern was we may now cause another gray area
over what we are trying to accomplish by convening an emergency meeting.
Vincent said in order to meet the State mandated election deadline for filing resolutions for the
February 8 election, today is the final day; if we waited past today, we would have to go to the
March election and that is certainly possible, but the nature of the emergency is in order to meet
the public policy of getting the contract on to the people, the election on the contract issue, there
is a financial requirement to fund the firefighters' decision, if that is the one the people make, in
order to meet Article 10, Section 26 of the Constitution, which is the debt limitation provision
which says we cannot enter into obligations without the proper funding to fund those obligations.
Vincent said it has been the City's policy, as adopted by Resolution 99-146, that sufficient funds
are not available, therefore, we have to keep the sales tax and the contract provisions together on
the same ballot.
Beller said his question would be is February 8th a drop dead date; does it have to be done by
February 8th. He said the only concern was whether we are once more getting ourselves into a
problem or gray area where someone can shoot at us again if it is, in fact, not an emergency.
Vincent said we have two gray areas; the gray area of the emergency which his office and the
City Manager believe it is an emergency, and the other gray area is how far you can push off an
election on a contract under the reasonable time standard of the statute. Vincent said we got the
decision back on November 4th or 7th, or early in November, and if we had done everything
possible, we might have even made a December election but we did make the January election,
and now because of the state election board's ruling that the financial part, the sales tax part, has
to have the 60-day notice, which we do disagree with and they offered to allow us to file a
lawsuit against them but that would just complicate everything, February 8th is the next available
date and we believe it does meet the emergency test under the financial requirements.
Shanklin asked Vincent if he was saying it is legal to do this. Vincent said as far as he was
concerned it was legal because you have the quagmire of the reasonableness of the contract and
then you have the financial obligation, so there is a potential problem either way you go.
Shanklin said we hire Mr. Vincent to make these decisions and he has made them.
Williams said if we are truly looking at a 60-day window, getting the decision back from the
arbitrator sometime early in November, that would have put the election in January at the
earliest, so if we are here because of the test of reasonableness, he did not know if February
versus March, it would still seem to be in a reasonableness criteria, and would have the same
questions Beller had expressed.
Devine asked if the firefighters were objecting to this, and if we are going to have a gray area,
where is the gray coming from; if no one objects, that is one side of the argument and this is the
other side in trying to settle this. He asked Gary Brooks if they had a problem with this.
Gary Brooks, Fire Union President, said he did not know that anyone had listened to any of their
objections so far and that they were just watching.
Purcell said you have got a gray area, regardless of what you do there will be the problem; if
someone wants to declare today to be a problem because this was not an emergency, that would
be one question; if you wait until next Tuesday and do it as a non-emergency and then not have
the election to March, someone could object to that. He said it would be a similar problem either
way.
VOTE ON MOTION: AYE: Williams, Devine, Purcell, Shanklin, Beller, Haywood, Warren,
Smith. NAY: None. MOTION CARRIED.
(Title only) Resolution No. 99-147
A resolution amending Resolutions 99-138 and 99-146, by changing the date of the special
election on the adoption of an employment agreement by and between the City of Lawton and the
International Association of Firefighters, Local 1882, for the fiscal year 1999-2000.
2. Consider adopting an ordinance amending Ordinance No. 99-42 relating to revenues
by
inserting a new date, as set by Resolution No. 99-147, for the election referenced in the section
establishing the effective date of the ordinance. Exhibits: Ordinance No. 99-43.
Baker said this is a related and companion item, on December 7, Council passed Ordinance No.
99-42 which would allow voters to increase the rate of the current sales tax to provide funding
for the collective bargaining agreement, if the agreement proposed by the International
Association of Firefighters is selected by the voters. He said the item this morning is an
ordinance to amend that ordinance to change the date from January 11, 2000, to February 8,
2000. Baker said he was advised by the City Attorney that the ordinance needed to be read
verbatim.
Ordinance was read in its entirety by the Mayor as follows:
"Ordinance No. 99-43
An ordinance amending Ordinance No. 99-42 relating to revenues by inserting a new date, as set
by Resolution No. 99-147, for the election referenced in the section establishing the effective
date of the ordinance.
Be it ordained by the Council of the City of Lawton, Oklahoma, that:
SECTION 1. Section 4 of Ordinance No. 99-42 shall be amended to read as follows:
Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in effect on and after April 1, 2000, subject to
the approval of a majority of the registered, qualified voters of the City of Lawton voting on the
same, to be held February 8, 2000, in the manner prescribed by law.
SECTION 2. The provisions of Ordinance No. 99-42, except as amended herein, remain in full
force and effect.
SECTION 3. Publication. The full text of this ordinance shall be published in a newspaper of
general circulation in the City of Lawton, Oklahoma.
Adopted and Approved by the Council of the City of Lawton, Oklahoma, this 9th day of
December, 1999."
MOVED by Purcell, SECOND by Smith, for approval of Ordinance No. 99-43. AYE: Devine,
Purcell, Shanklin, Beller, Haywood, Warren, Smith. NAY: Williams. MOTION CARRIED.
There was no further business to consider and the meeting adjourned at 8:45 a.m. upon motion,
second and roll call vote.